Deviations are on the horizon
Watch HypnoticPrecognition to be the first to see new deviations.
GJYYNGII
schnappie
Quantization
rryzzel
Kyuui
Chelleromo
Aerohana
anguspie
Kid-Umby
Nahc-Uret
Coley77
PanjackHana
cold-hearted-world
Rhyme-and-Reason
iWriteToInspire
LoveLiterature
WordsNeverFail
LooseLacesPoetry
The-Free-Pens
OnlyPoetry
WritingRomance
SoupAndButter
WritersPen
RottedStamps
riflow
HtebazileEnna
Nahc-Uret
- Jan 8
- Deviant for 13 years
Badges
I used to be an asshole. Man, was I compensating for something. Sorry, about all of that. Fuck this account and this identity, lol; I was right to abandon it back then. In the time it took for me to come to my senses and realize what a terrible pers...
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
ARE YOU FROM THE LATE 80's OR EARLY 90's WHO HAD A CRAZY MOTHER, DISTANT FATHER, PLAYED POKEMON, AND OWNED A NINTENDO 64, WAS A SOCIAL OUTCAST IN SCHOOL, AND CONSIDERS THEMSELVES AS ABOVE-AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE?
26 votes
OMG THAT'S TOTALLY ME YOU FUCKING CREEPY STALKER
That mostly describes me.
That could be me.
I'm mostly different than that.
That doesn't describe me at all.
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
I just found something awesome.
If anyone else hates Google's new image search layout, I just discovered how to change it back to the way it was before.
Go to Google.com. Click On to "Search Settings" or "Preferences" *(In the top/right corner of the Google homepage). On the Global Preferences page, in the Interface Language box, change the "Display Google tips and messages in" to "Elmer Fud", "Bork, Bork, Bork." or "Hacker". IT will change the Google language (of everything but the search results) to a broken, kinda lulzy form of English, but the image search function will be reverted to the way it used to be.
You're welcome. Also, this p
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Profile Comments 271
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Happy birthday.
Just so you know, I was blocked by her, so really, all that banter about how you lost all respect for me blah blah
tl;dr
I left the group long before it was shutdown, so you saying I'm "butthurt" about it being gone, is actually false.
tl;dr
I left the group long before it was shutdown, so you saying I'm "butthurt" about it being gone, is actually false.
I did not realize that she blocked you, since her block list isn't public information.
You NOT being a member of the BHB anymore means nothing. This is a strawman, and you should know that.
If you are not butthurt by the group being gone, why have you completely changed your rhetoric? I can clearly remember a similar thing happening in the past, except the target was sonicfags. Back then, you were a cheerleader for having them all banned, and rightfully so, as they had been breaking rules. You agreed with the people who celebrated the loss of these users, and attacked those that did not. It was a very similar situation.
However, the tables have turned, and it isn't okay now. It's laughable, really, as well as it is lamentable that we've lost someone who was previously objective and impartial.
TL;DR: [Evidence] [Evidence] [Moar Evidence] [Bestest Evidence]
You NOT being a member of the BHB anymore means nothing. This is a strawman, and you should know that.
If you are not butthurt by the group being gone, why have you completely changed your rhetoric? I can clearly remember a similar thing happening in the past, except the target was sonicfags. Back then, you were a cheerleader for having them all banned, and rightfully so, as they had been breaking rules. You agreed with the people who celebrated the loss of these users, and attacked those that did not. It was a very similar situation.
However, the tables have turned, and it isn't okay now. It's laughable, really, as well as it is lamentable that we've lost someone who was previously objective and impartial.
TL;DR: [Evidence] [Evidence] [Moar Evidence] [Bestest Evidence]
Am I not allowed to express concern for my two friends in the staff being unrightfully banned, am I meant to be that cold-hearted? I'm expressing my support to them. Not for glasses really, he's a dickwad and he'll always be back anyway.
And for another matter, why does this matter to you? Like, what benefit do you gain from you pointing out that I'm showing some sort of defense towards them? Just curious, because really, I think you wouldn't care or give the slightest fuck about it.
And for another matter, why does this matter to you? Like, what benefit do you gain from you pointing out that I'm showing some sort of defense towards them? Just curious, because really, I think you wouldn't care or give the slightest fuck about it.
I never said you weren't allowed to express concern for your friends, although, you can't say they were "unrightfully" banned. I know people that were banned for FAR less than being a figurehead of deviantART's EncyclopediaDramatica. And, quite frankly, I don't care about BHB. If you recall, I owned BHB for a while, and tried to deactivate the group. Probably should have held on to it and let it die on it's own, but alas, vision is always 20/20 in hindsight.
I'm just trying to point out how hypocritical it is to target a person for celebrating the loss of a group that probably targeted them, when that person would have proudly celebrated the loss of different groups. The big difference is, this time, it's something you like. When the sonicfag ban-a-thon happened, you cheered. If we banned groups where "emo" 14-year-old girls cut themselves and banned the admins, people would assume they'd have done something against the etiquette policy to get banned.
If this is so, why is it unsafe to assume that the admins of the BHB who were banned along side of the BHB and glasses were banned because they had also done something wrong? If staff were banning for association, ALL of the admins in the group would have been banned and not simply a few of them.
I'm just trying to point out how hypocritical it is to target a person for celebrating the loss of a group that probably targeted them, when that person would have proudly celebrated the loss of different groups. The big difference is, this time, it's something you like. When the sonicfag ban-a-thon happened, you cheered. If we banned groups where "emo" 14-year-old girls cut themselves and banned the admins, people would assume they'd have done something against the etiquette policy to get banned.
If this is so, why is it unsafe to assume that the admins of the BHB who were banned along side of the BHB and glasses were banned because they had also done something wrong? If staff were banning for association, ALL of the admins in the group would have been banned and not simply a few of them.
View all replies
Your avatar made me giggle. 
you know hacking people's computers and sending them spam and illegally obtaining people's addresses and posting it without their knowledge and telling people to send them "junk mail" is federal offense right?